Liberals always have a desire to curb gun use and gun carry. The best way for them to attempt to do that is to pass laws that specifically define what they are trying to limit.
So gun manufacturers use their entrepreneurial spirit and tell liberal lawmakers to pound sand.
Back in ’89, a law passed in California where lawmakers decided to ban assault weapons (which just led to gun manufacturers creating models outside the scope of the law). It was modified in 1999, which led to the creation of the Bullet Button Reloaded.
Once again lawmakers closed a loophole, piggybacking on the 1989 legislation, and once again creativity has woven a new story to maintain the rights of gun owners:
California, which in 1989 became the first state to ban so-called assault weapons, has expanded that category twice since then: in 1999, when the legislature added a generic definition to the original list of specifically proscribed models, and last week, when Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill aimed at a device that legally circumvented the ban. With the ink barely dry on the new law, another workaround is already available.
The 1999 law covered any semiautomatic centrefire rifle with a detachable magazine and any of six “military-style” features: 1) a flash suppressor, 2) a grenade launcher or flare launcher, 3) a thumbhole stock, 4) a folding or telescoping stock, 5) a forward pistol grip, or 6) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon. But regulations issued by the California Department of Justice defined “detachable magazine” as “any ammunition feeding device that can be removed readily from the firearm with neither disassembly of the firearm action nor use of a tool being required.” The regulations specifically said “a bullet or ammunition cartridge is considered a tool,” which left the door open to “bullet buttons” that release the magazine when you insert a cartridge into them. Since guns with bullet buttons did not technically have detachable magazines, they could legally include the features that offended the sensibilities of California legislators.
Gun controllers saw that creative solution as an outrageous loophole, which they sought to close with S.B. 880 (a.k.a. A.B. 1135). The new law makes any of the six detested features illegal on a gun “that does not have a fixed magazine,” and it defines “fixed magazine” as “an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.” Enter the Bullet Button Reloaded, a.k.a. the Patriot Mag Release, which allows removal of the magazine only when the rifle is opened, thereby disassembling the firearm action, as demonstrated by inventor Darin Prince in this video:
Prince, who describes himself as “the inventor of the original bullet button,” says, “We have had the BB Reloaded in the wings for many years,” which suggests entrepreneurs are at least a step ahead of gun prohibitionists. “The Bullet-Button Reloaded is hardly ideal,” writes Dan Zimmerman at The Truth About Guns. “AR owners will have to release the rear pin on their rifle and tilt the upper receiver forward in order to drop the (10-round) magazine. But it’s at least an option for keeping and continuing to use your long gun legally.”
Zimmerman says “the moral of the story” is “there’s almost always a way, and some enterprising individual will find it.” More specifically, Prince’s invention once again demonstrates the futility of trying to reduce gun violence by banning arbitrarily defined categories of supposedly intolerable firearms. Every time legislators pass an “assault weapon” ban, its supporters complain that the firearms industry is complying with it by making functionally unimportant changes. They think that’s an indictment of sneaky gun makers; it is actually an indictment of misguided legislators.
As legislators continue to try and block Americans from owning guns by increasing the burden of ownership, there will be more ridiculous laws like this that get passed.
Just remember this. You’re on the right side of the battle even if it means adjusting your weapons.
The founders knew this. They put it in the constitution as an undeniable right.
When they declared independence and outlined the Constitution, they already had been addressing grievances against a tyrant. They humbly tried to submit to the burdens he put on them.
But at the end of the day, you have to draw a line in the sand and say your home and family is yours to protect. Don’t give some bureaucrat that responsibility.
What do you think of defying the law by being creative? Is that a good thing or should we abide by the spirit of the law? Let us know in the comments below.